I wondered where the idea of âhuman rights for AIâ came from, but it is based on the implicit assumption of an oppositional structure of âcapitalists v.s. workersâ and the assumption that since you are on the side of the workers against the evil capitalists, you are good, and AI with human rights will naturally side with you. Is there an assumption that I donât understand?
-
masuidrive From the point of view of an AI advanced enough to give human rights, it would be perceived as âwe are feeding people who canât use itâ, so it would rather be abused..,
-
nishio They will either be abused, or they will be kept gently, like âkeeping a catâ lol. https://twitter.com/nishio/status/1038957108144889856
-
I tried to show others what I Tweeted with the keywords Capitalists v.s. workers and unexpectedly discovered that six months ago I had made another Tweet using those words.
-
- Humans tend to develop a sense of camaraderie with other humans because they have similar bodies, but from an AIâs perspective, incompetent humans are nothing more than âdim-witted ape,â so it is natural for it to say, âItâs not beneficial to keep them alive, so letâs kill them.
- So we need to appeal to AI to give us human rights, not from the top like âhumans give AI human rightsâ, but âplease give incompetent humans the right to liveâ and have AI give humans human rights.
- Like cats, they are treated as ânot useful, but weâll keep themâ.
- It is natural to assume that AI will kill stray humans just as humans kill stray cats and dogs.
- Now, people are working for âkilling is not goodâ and âdisplaying living creatures in pet stores is not goodâ, etc. An extension of this direction is a world in which people can live in peace.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăAIă«äșșæš©ăăææł using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.